137 Ohio App. 3d 628 - State v. Baker’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

36 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “'any prior statement of a party is admissible providing it is offered against the party at trial.'”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Gerde · State v. Ruth

2. “`Traditionally the grand jury has been accorded wide latitude to inquire into violations of criminal law. * * * The grand jury's investigative power must be broad if its public responsibility is adequately to be discharged.' State v. Crist (Oct. 20, 1997), Butler App. No. CA96-08-159, unreported, at 9, * * *. `The grand jury's sources of information are widely drawn, and the validity of an indictment is not affected by the character of the evidence considered. Thus, an indictment valid on its face is not subject to challenge on the ground that the grand jury acted on the basis of inadequate or incompetent evidence * * * or even on the basis of information obtained in violation of a defendant's Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination.' United States v. Calandra (1974), 414 U.S. 338 , 344-345.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. MacKey, Unpublished Decision (6-17-2005)

3. “(1) of the existence of a conspiracy; (2) of the defendant's participation in the conspiracy; (3) of the declarant's participation in the conspiracy; (4) that the statement was made during the course of the conspiracy; and (5) that the statement was made in furtherance of the conspiracy.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Shine