137 Ohio App. 3d 718 - State v. Landrum’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 96 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 98 later decisions — most recently January 2024 · most notably United States v. Steed (2008), State v. Dickess (2008)
2 federal appellate · 96 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Katz v. United States · Ornelas v. United States · Delaware v. Prouse · State v. Fanning
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 98 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“{¶ 17} “(C) Authorized employees of the commission’s transportation department shall utilize the following criteria in determining which documents, motor vehicles, and cargo to inspect and which employees of an offeror or motor carrier to interview: * * * {¶ 18} “(5) Any uniform statistical selection procedure, such as every fifth motor vehicle or every motor vehicle entering an inspection site * *”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Generally, a party cannot assert new legal theories for the first time on appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.