Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 137 Ohio App. 3d 742 - State v. Caton

137 Ohio App. 3d 742 - State v. Caton’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
1
states following
September 2025
most recently cited

40 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently September 2025 · most notably 172 Ohio App. 3d 25 - State v. Peck (2007), 140 Ohio App. 3d 322 - State v. Allen (2000)

40 state decisions

150200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Thompkins · 20 Ohio App. 3d 172 - State v. Martin · Tibbs v. Florida · State v. McGee · State v. Sammons

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “No person, who is the parent, guardian, custodian, person having custody or control, or person in loco parentis of a child under eighteen years of age * * * shall create a substantial risk to the health or safety of the child, by violating a duty of care, protection, or support.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “* * * a strong possibility, as contrasted with a remote or significant possibility, that a certain result may occur or that certain circumstances may exist.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “A person acts recklessly when, with heedless indifference to the consequences, he perversely disregards a known risk that his conduct is likely to cause a certain result or is likely to be of a certain nature. A person is reckless with respect to circumstances when, with heedless indifference to the consequences, he perversely disregards a known risk that such circumstances are likely to exist.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.