¶1 (concurring in result) : There are circumstances pointed out by Justice Stabler which justified the application to the Pullman Company of the rule of highest degree of care; but I do not think that the opinion sufficiently discriminates between injuries sustained from instrumentalities under the sole control of the company arid those sustained from conditions caused by the negligence of a fellow passenger. As to these the rule of ordinary care in the discovery of the danger prevails.
137 S.C. 433
135 S.E 563
Forbes v. Pullman Company
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided November 16, 1926
Supreme Court of South Carolina · decided 1926-11-16
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently December 1941
1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1926-11-16
View the full empirical analysis of this case →