Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

137 S. Ct. 369

Najar v. Arizona

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided October 31, 2016

Supreme Court of the United States · decided 2016-10-31

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently April 2023

1 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions

Relies on Montgomery v. Louisiana · Tatum v. Arizona

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2016-10-31

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1*370On petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One for further consideration in light of Montgomery v. Louisiana, 577 U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 718, 193 L.Ed.2d 599 (2016).

¶2Justice SOTOMAYOR concurs in the decision to grant, vacate, and remand. See Tatum v. Arizona, 580 U.S. ----, 137 S.Ct. 11, --- L.E.2d ---- (2016) ( Sotomayor, J., concurring). Justice ALITO, with whom Justice THOMAS joins, dissents from the decision to grant, vacate, and remand. See Tatum v. Arizona, 580 U.S. ----, 137 S.Ct. 11, --- L.E.2d ---- (2016) (Alito, J., dissenting).

/137/sct/369 · .json · Public domain