Finneran v. Finneran’s Empirical Analysis
1962
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
February 1975
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 121 So. 2d 648 - Ramagli Realty Co. v. Craver · 93 So. 2d 390 - Johnson v. Every · Thomas v. Cilbe, Inc. · Fort v. Fort · 97 So. 2d 252 - Marshall v. Bacon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In construing Rules 3.2 and 4.2 in relation to the pending motion, we come to this conclusion: that the order in question is an interlocutory decree and not a final decree and that this appeal therefrom, taken under Rule 3.2, must be dismissed. The motion to dismiss is granted.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Burton v. Sanders
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.