¶1Affirmed. See I.R. v. State, 385 So.2d 686, 687-88 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980) (“Where the evidence is in conflict, it is within the province of the trier of fact to assess the credibility of witnesses, and upon evaluating the testimony, rely upon the testimony found by it to be worthy of belief and reject such testimony found by it to be untrue.... The testimony of a single witness, even if uncorroborated and contradicted by other State witnesses, is sufficient to sustain a conviction.”).
137 So. 3d 1124
N.W. v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided March 26, 2014
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2014-03-26
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently February 2015
2 state decisions
Relies on I.R. v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2014-03-26
View the full empirical analysis of this case →