¶1ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT
¶2Pursuant to Haygood v. State, 109 So.3d 735 (Fla.2013), we withdraw the mandate issued June 6, 2011, and our previously entered opinion, and reverse and remand for a new trial.
¶3REVERSED AND REMANDED.
137 So. 3d 465
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided March 21, 2014
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2014-03-21
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently September 2016
2 state decisions
Relies on 109 So. 3d 735 - Haygood v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2014-03-21
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT
¶2Pursuant to Haygood v. State, 109 So.3d 735 (Fla.2013), we withdraw the mandate issued June 6, 2011, and our previously entered opinion, and reverse and remand for a new trial.
¶3REVERSED AND REMANDED.