Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 137 SO3D 505 - Odegaard v. State

Odegaard v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Teague v. Lane · Griffith v. Kentucky · Padilla v. Kentucky · Porter v. McCollum

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “all pertinent matters bearing on the choice of which plea to enter and the particulars attendant upon each plea and the likely results thereof, as well as any possible alternatives that may be open to the defendant.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[u]nquestionably, a plea cannot be knowing and voluntary if the defendant does not understand all direct consequences of the plea, including those that affect the range of punishment”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Even where trial counsel's misadvice results in a defendant's rejection of a favorable plea offer, the State is not required to reoffer its original plea on remand.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.