Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

137 So. 3d 569

Cooper v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2014-04-25

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 2016

1 state decisions

Relies on 62 So. 3d 1236 - SENAT v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2014-04-25

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

MORRIS, Judge.

¶1Willie James Cooper, III, appeals the revocation of his probation and his resulting prison sentences. We affirm the revocation of his probation and his sentences without comment, but we remand for the correction of two scrivener’s errors in the order of revocation. See Senat v. State, 62 So.3d 1236 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011). The order states that Cooper admitted the violations and that he violated conditions “1, 2, 5, 9, [and] 11,” but the record reflects that Cooper did not admit the violations and that the trial court found Cooper in violation of condition 3 (not condition 2) ■ along with *570conditions 1, 5, 9, and 11. On remand, the trial court is directed to correct the order.

¶2Affirmed; remanded with directions.

ALTENBERND and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.
/137/so3d/569 · .json · Public domain