137 So. 3d 752 - State v. Olivia’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 708 So. 2d 401 - State v. Byrd · 676 So. 2d 1144 - Augustus v. St. Mary Parish School Bd. · 108 So. 3d 296 - State v. Schmolke · 848 So. 2d 740 - BD. OF DIR. OF IND. DEV. v. All Taxpayers · 672 So. 2d 1102 - State v. Lagarde
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The indictment shall be a plain, concise, and definite 'written statement of the essential facts constituting the offense charged. It shall state for each count the official or customary citation of the statute which the defendant is alleged to have violated. Error in the citation or its omission shall not be ground for dismissal of the indictment or for reversal of a conviction if the error or omission did not mislead the defendant to his prejudice.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[o]n appeal from the trial court's ruling on a motion to quash, the trial court's legal findings are subject to a de novo standard of review”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Pursuant to La.C.Cr.P. art. 464, the omission of the citation will not be ground for dismissal if the omission did not mislead Ms. Olivia to her prejudice. The bill of information plainly demonstrates the State charged Ms. Olivia with “First Degree Vehicular Negligent Injuring,” and Ms. Olivia could have easily determined which statute she was charged with violating by referencing the Louisiana Criminal Code. Therefore, the bill of information charged Ms. Olivia with an offense punishable under La. R.S. 14:39.2, a valid statute.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.