Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 137 SW 383 - Buchner v. Wait

Buchner v. Wait’s Empirical Analysis

1911

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
2
states following
February 1978
most recently cited

28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently February 1978 · most notably Cocke v. Smith (1944), Boyles v. Gresham (1954)

28 state decisions

701911192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Moore Son v. Moore · Moore v. Blagge · Kalteyer v. Wipff · Branch v. Hanrick · Patterson v. Allen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““When invoked in a proper manner, this jurisdiction of the county court becomes exclusive, and, unless facts exist which would make its exercise unauthorized under the statute, no other court can assume jurisdiction to make the settlement, partition, and distribution of estates of deceased persons until the time in which such proceeding could be brought in the county court has expired, or, if an administration has been begun in the county court, until the administration is closed.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““The petition shows no necessity for invoking the equity powers of the court to require an accounting by the trustee, nor does it show any matters in dispute between the parties. . . . It is expressly alleged in the petition that the trustee has rendered an account to the plaintiffs, and the correctness of that account is not questioned, and there is no issue between the parties as to their respective interests in the estate.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.