Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 137 SW3D 184 - Stewart v. State

Stewart v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 2005
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 184th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Clewis v. State · Jones v. State · Muniz v. State · Swearingen v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “is one who may testify in an official proceeding. Ortiz v. State, 93 S.W.3d 79, 86 (Tex.Crim.App.2002); see Morrow v. State, 862 S.W.2d 612, 614 (Tex.Crim.App.1993). A person who witnesses an offense, but who has not yet testified in a trial involving that offense, is also a prospective witness. Morrow, 862 S.W.2d at 614 ; see also Ortiz, 93 S.W.3d at 86 (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. In Re KH
  2. “Any person who is involved in an offense with a defendant, who sees the defendant committing an offense, or who hears the defendant discuss committing an offense is a `prospective witness' in the prosecution of that defendant because he `may' testify.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. In Re KH

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.