Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 137 SW3D 325 - Davis v. Burnam

Davis v. Burnam’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
November 2009
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 250th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Weinstein v. Bradford · Murphy v. Hunt · Texas Ass'n of Business v. Texas Air Control Board · Texas Department of Parks & Wildlife v. Miranda · Bland Independent School District v. Blue

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the merits” and turning on “statutory construction” of the agency’s powers, the basis for our holding was that the plaintiff had added this ultra vires claim only one day before a hearing on the plea to the jurisdiction related to other claims and that the agency, therefore, had inadequate notice that the trial court might rule regarding its jurisdiction over the newly-added claim, and inadequate opportunity to develop its arguments and authorities. Id. & n. 16. . The supreme court did not explicitly hold that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.