Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 137 SW3D 923 - Long v. Spencer

Long v. Spencer’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
December 2017
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 336th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Crowson v. Wakeham · Youngs v. Choice · Langford v. Carr · Christensen v. Harkins · Kelley v. Harsch

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The reasoning behind the rule is clear: in the partition process, decisions must be made upon which other decisions will be based. An appeal at each stage provides a practical way to review controlling, intermediate decisions before the consequences of any error do irreparable injury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “This is because a partition proceeding is-at least-a two-step process.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.