Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 137 U.S. 266 - Broom v. Armstrong

Broom v. Armstrong’s Empirical Analysis

137 U.S. 266 · 1890

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
December 2014
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2014

1 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

301890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pennoyer v. Neff · Shaw v. Railroad Co. · Hervey v. Rhode Island Locomotive Works · John Conard v. The Atlantic Insurance Company New York · Harkness v. Russell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is therefore a proceeding in rom, as much so as an attachment suit against the property of an absent debtor or a suit instituted to partition real estate; and the property is within the power of the court until the judgment or decree is entered, so that the lien upon it may be enforced, as the statute requires.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.