State v. Martin’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. James Daniel Good Real Property · United States v. Montalvo-Murillo · United States v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Co. · Insurance Company v. Norton · Vrettos v. Plainfield Post Office
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is settled beyond doubt or controversy, upon the foundation of the great principle of public policy, applicable to all governments alike, which forbids that the public interests should be prejudiced by the negligence of the officers or agents to whose care they are confided.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Martin“It is time for us to recognize the error we originated in Krall and perpetuated in Moen and Mollichi the imposition of forfeiture as the remedy for violation of the statutory time limit. The Legislature merely said restitution”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Martin“be set at the time of sentencing. In Krall , we assumed it dispositive of the issue simply to announce that”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Martin
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.