State v. McCorkle’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
33
cited by 33 later decisions
1
states following
August 2009
most recently cited
1 federal appellate · 30 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 105 Wash. 2d 175 - State v. Ammons · State v. Sanwick · State v. Ford · 121 Wash. 2d 707 - State v. Mail · 75 Wash. App. 500 - State v. Roche
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]here the State fails to carry its burden of proof after a specific objection, it would not be provided a further opportunity to do so.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Gill · State v. Lopez“cannot be determined without first classifying the conviction as a class A, B, or C felony under Washington law. See RCW 9.94A.360(2). Thus, McCorkle's”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. McCorkle“under RCW 9.94A.360(2). Whether a prior out-of-state conviction”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. McCorkle
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.