Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 137 WASH2D 518 - Bishop v. Miche

Bishop v. Miche’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

53
cited by 53 later decisions
2
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

52 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently January 2019 · most notably Bishop v. Miche (1999), Tyner v. DSHS, Child Protective Serv. (2000)

52 state decisions

450199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Payne v. Tennessee · 100 Wash. 2d 421 - Petersen v. State · 118 Wash. 2d 195 - Taggart v. State · 77 Wash. 2d 649 - In Re Stranger Creek · Schooley v. Pinch's Deli Market, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The duty of a county probation officer is not premised merely on the reporting of violations to the court, but rather on the failure to adequately monitor and report violations, thus failure to adequately supervise the probationer.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[b]e placed on probation with the King County District Court Probation Department for 24 months and abide by all terms, conditions, rules and regulations of the Probation Department ... during this period.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “As a matter of law, the judge's decision not to revoke probation under these circumstances broke any causal connection between any negligence and the accident.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.