State v. Studd’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
41 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently July 2014 · most notably State v. Studd (1999), State v. Momah (2009)
41 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bousley v. United States · Jirovec v. Wood · 117 Wash. 2d 93 - State v. Kjorsvik · United States v. Perez · 126 Wash. 2d 315 - State v. Olson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[trial] counsel can hardly be faulted for requesting a jury instruction based upon a then-unquestioned WPIC 16.02.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“[a] jury instruction misstating the law of self-defense amounts to an error of constitutional magnitude and is presumed prejudicial.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Woods · State v. Studd“Each side is entitled to have the jury instructed on its theory of the case if there is evidence to support that theory.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Studd · State v. Irons
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.