Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 137 WASH2D 675 - State v. Enstone

State v. Enstone’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
3
states following
April 2008
most recently cited

22 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 116 Wash. 2d 917 - State v. Davison · State v. Michielli · State v. Moen · 102 Wash. 2d 355 - United Parcel Service, Inc. v. Department of Revenue · 89 Wash. 2d 38 - State v. Blight

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) ... [R]estitution ordered by a court pursuant to a criminal conviction shall be based on easily ascertainable damages for injury to or loss of property.... The amount of restitution shall not exceed double the amount of the offender's gain or the victim's loss from the commission of the crime.... (2) Restitution shall be ordered whenever the offender is convicted of an offense which results in injury to any person or damage to or loss of property.... In addition, restitution shall be ordered to pay for an injury, loss, or damage if the offender pleads guilty to a lesser offense or fewer offenses and agrees with the prosecutor's recommendation that the offender be required to pay restitution to a victim of an offense or offenses which are not prosecuted pursuant to a plea agreement.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “`manifestly unreasonable, or exercised on untenable grounds, or for untenable reasons.'”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[A] trial court need only find that a victim's injuries were causally connected to a defendant's crime before ordering a defendant to pay restitution for the expenses which resulted.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.