Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 137 W. Va. 519 - State v. Howard

137 W. Va. 519 - State v. Howard’s Empirical Analysis

1952

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
2
states following
September 1982
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently September 1982 · most notably 141 W. Va. 55 - State v. Huffman (1955), 142 W. Va. 18 - State v. Carduff (1956)

26 state decisions

1401952196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 128 W. Va. 655 - State v. Hudson · 134 W. Va. 771 - State v. Young · 75 W. Va. 7 - State v. Wetzel · 36 W. Va. 179 - State v. Mounts · 116 W. Va. 300 - Scott v. Harshbarger

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““At least twelve of the grand jurors must concur in finding or making an indictment or presentment. They may make a presentment or find an indictment upon the information of two or more of their own body, and when a presentment or indictment is so made, or on the testimony of witnesses called on by the grand jury, or sent to it by the court, the names of the grand jurors giving the information, or of the witnesses, shall be written at the foot of the presentment or indictment.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “* * * [The two jury commissioners] shall be appointed by the circuit court, or the judge thereof in vacation, of their respective counties. * * * Vacancies caused by death, resignation or otherwise, shall be filled for the unexpired term in the same manner as the original appointments. (Emphasis added.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.