Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 138 ALA 310 - Frohlichstein v. Jordan

Frohlichstein v. Jordan’s Empirical Analysis

1903

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
February 1935
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently February 1935

4 state decisions

201903191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Clark v. Lamb · Payne v. The Governor · Hudson v. Modawell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If the appeal .was not claimed within five days, the justice had no authority to grant it, and, if he should have done so, it would have been liable to be dismissed on it so appearing iu the court to which it was taken.”'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.