Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 138 ALA 448 - Moore v. Holdoway & Co.

Moore v. Holdoway & Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1903

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
January 1959
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently January 1959

2 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

30190319101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Comer & Co. v. Way & Edmundson · Loventhal & Son v. Morris

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “there must be a mutual agreement between the parties,' as to the allowance of their respective claims, and to establish such an account there must be proof of `assent to the account as rendered. To maintain the action as averred in the complaint, the plaintiff must prove an account stated; that, and nothing else, will support his allegations.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “An account stated is an account balanced and rendered, with an assent to the balance, expressed or implied, so that the demand is essentially the same as if a promissory note had been given for the balance.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.