Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 138 ARK 594 - Kindrix v. State

Kindrix v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1919

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
December 1980
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Commonwealth v. Costley · Speer v. State · Atkins v. State · Capps v. State · Osborne v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is, of course, not only improper, but is error calling for the reversal of the judgment, for the court to communicate with the jury, in the absence of the defendant, any directions in regard to their verdict. Hinson v. State, 133 Ark. 149 ; Pearson v. State, 119 Ark. 152 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.