Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 138 CALAPP 303 - Gibson v. Easley

Gibson v. Easley’s Empirical Analysis

1934

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
January 1955
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently January 1955

16 state decisions

80193419401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ex Parte Daniels · 103 Cal. App. 531 - White v. Davis · Stein v. United R.R. of S.F. · Starr v. Los Angeles Railway Corp. · McDougald v. Hulet

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Wilful misconduct implies at least the intentional doing of something either with a knowledge that serious injury is a probable (as distinguished from a possible) result, or the intentional doing of an act with a wanton and reckless disregard of its possible result.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.