138 Cal. App. 622 - Van Epps v. Aufdemkamp’s Empirical Analysis
1934
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently March 1964
5 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Tinker v. Colwell · McIntyre v. Kavanaugh · Commonwealth v. Williams · Roller v. Warren
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[W]e are of the opinion that such conversion was willful, because it was voluntary, and malicious, because it was intentional, and that the judgment based upon such injury is not released by the discharge in bankruptcy.” (Id. 138 Cal.App. at 624 , 32 P.2d at 1117 .)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Martin v. Rosenbaum
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.