Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 138 CALAPP 660 - In re Friday

In re Friday’s Empirical Analysis

1934

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
2
states following
September 1974
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently September 1974

13 state decisions

6019341940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 65 Cal. App. 420 - In Re Lake · Blodgett v. Superior Court · Lamberson v. Superior Court of Tulare Cty.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “bounden duty to protect the integrity of his court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.