Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 138 COLO 214 - Means v. Pratt

Means v. Pratt’s Empirical Analysis

1958

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
March 2015
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently March 2015

21 state decisions

601958196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on City of Colorado Springs v. Yust · Nichols v. McIntosh · Cline v. McDowell · Arnold v. Roup · James v. Barker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “€œone does not lose his possessory property rights in water by diverting the water at a point or points other than those decreed to him.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.