Chebro v. Audette’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of Manchester · Gordon v. Tobias · Beverly Hills Concepts, Inc. v. Schatz & Schatz, Ribicoff & Kotkin · Herbert S. Newman & Partners, P.C. v. CFC Construction Ltd. Partnership · Blais v. the Beacon Mutual Ins. Company
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“examine the record to determine whether the trier of fact could have reached a conclusion other than the one reached. Rather, we focus on the conclusion of the trial court, as well as the method by which it arrived at that conclusion, to determine whether it is legally correct and factually supported.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.