Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

138 F. 1006

Docket No. 67.

Vanderbilt v. Eidmann

Second Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided April 4, 1905.)

Second Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1905-04-04

<p>In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.</p> <p>The Circuit Court of Appeals certified certain questions in the case to the Supreme Court, which were answered in Vanderbilt v. Eidman, 196 U. S. 480, 25 Sup. Ct. 331, 49 L. Ed. 563.</p>

2 counsel of record

Relies on William Vanderbilt v. Ferdinand Eidman · Vanderbilt v. Eidman

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1905-04-04

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently August 1979

5 federal appellate ·

2019051910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.

¶2For decision below, see (C. C.) 121 Fed. 590.

¶3The Circuit Court of Appeals certified certain questions in the case to the Supreme Court, which were answered in Vanderbilt v. Eidman, 196 U. S. 480, 25 Sup. Ct. 331, 49 L. Ed. 563.

¶4Anderson & Anderson, for plaintiffs in error.

¶5Henry L. Burnett, U. S. Atty., for defendant in error.

¶6Before WALLACE, LACOMBE, and COXE, Circuit Judges.

¶7PER CURIAM.

¶8Judgment sustaining demurrer reversed, with costs, and with directions to enter judgment for plaintiffs, upon demurrer, for relief demanded in complaint.

/138/f1d/1006 · .json · Public domain