Brown v. Quinlan, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
138 F.2d 228 · 1943
Citation profile
22 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently September 1992
22 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Mayo v. Lakeland Highlands Canning Co. · Public Service Commission v. Wisconsin Telephone Co. · Polk Co. v. Glover · Railroad Commission of Wisconsin v. Maxcy · City of Sumter v. Spur Distributing Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is of the highest importance to a proper review of the action of a court in granting or refusing a preliminary injunction that there should be fair compliance with Rule 52(a) of the Rules of Civil Procedure”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““To effect an involuntary termination of a suit requires, in the absence of waiver of final hearing, a hearing upon a motion for summary judgment or to dismiss the complaint.” ■”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.