Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

138 F.2d 422

Docket Patent Appeal No. 4764.

In re Donaldson

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 1, 1943.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 29, 1943.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · decided 1943-06-01

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently March 1953

1 state decisions

2 counsel of record

Relies on In re Donaldson

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1943-06-01

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶131 C.C.P. A. (Patents)

¶2George E. Stebbins, of Pittsburgh, Pa., and Donald A. Gardiner, of Washington, D. C., for appellant.

¶3W. W. Cochran, of Washington, D. C. (E. L. Reynolds, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for the Commissioner of Patents.

¶4Before GARRETT, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, LENROOT, and JACKSON, Associate Judges.

¶5LENROOT, Associate Judge.

¶6This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming a decision of the Primary Examiner rejecting all of the claims of appellant’s application upon the ground of prima facie use and sale of the involved device for more than one year prior to the date of his application.

¶7The sole question presented here is that presented and concurrently decided by us in the companion case of In re Donaldson, 138 F.2d 419, 31 C.C.P.A., Patents,-.

¶8Our decision in that case is controlling here, and for the reasons therein stated the decision of the Board of Appeals is affirmed.

¶9Affirmed.

/138/f2d/422 · .json · Public domain