Josserand v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis
138 F.2d 58 · 1943
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently June 1994
2 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States ex. rel. Lowry & Planters Compress Co. v. Allen · American Cable Co. v. John A. Roebling's Sons Co. · Janette v. Folds · Richards v. Meissner · Headley & Thompson v. Bridges
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A motion to amend an interference, under rule 109 [a predecessor to Rule 231], supra, is an interlocutory motion, and merely presents the question as to whether or not the interference shall be redeclared. It does not, when denied, relate to the issue of priority of invention of the count or counts involved in the interference, and neither the Board of Interference Examiners, nor, on appeal, this court, has authority to review and determine that issue. [Citations omitted.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Wetmore v. Quick““In a drive-in theater a plurality of inclined parking ramps for elevating the front ends of automobiles parked in said theater, a plurality of inclined drive-over ramps merging with the higher portions of said parking ramps, and a plurality of driveways, each of said driveways merging with the lower portion of one of said drive-over ramps on one side thereof and with the lower portion of one of said parking ramps on the other side thereof.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Josserand v. Taylor
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.