Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

138 F.2d 591

Docket No. 8295.

Goodwin v. Coe

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued Oct. 7,1943.

Decided Nov. 1, 1943.

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1943-11-01

2 counsel of record

Relies on Abbott v. Coe

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1943-11-01

¶1Mr. H. Frank Wiegand, of New York City, with whom Messrs. Nathaniel L. Leek, of New York City, and Robert C. Watson, of Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for appellants.

¶2Mr. W. W. Cochran, of Washington, D. C., Solicitor, United States Patent Office, for appellee.

¶3Before GRONER, Chief Justice, and MILLER and EDGERTON, Associate Justices.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5This is a suit under R.S. § 4915, 35 U.S. C.A. § 63, to obtain a patent on a snap-on cover for a container. In our opinion the finding of the trial court that the claims do not show invention over the prior art is consistent with the evidence. The judgment dismissing the complaint is therefore affirmed. Abbott v. Coe, 71 App.D.C. 195, 109 F.2d 449.

/138/f2d/591 · .json · Public domain