Sutton v. Eastern Viavi Co.’s Empirical Analysis
138 F.2d 959 · 1943
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 3 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently February 2003
2 federal appellate · 3 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ownes v. Nagel · Fifth National Bank v. Village of Hyde Park · United States v. George A. Fuller Co. · Ruwitch v. Frankel
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"No claim for relief is stated if complaint pleads facts sufficient to show that a legal wrong has been'omitted or omits an averment necessary to establish the wrong, or fails ' so to link that party with the wrong as to entitle the plaintiff to redress."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Camacho v. Santos
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.