United States v. Einfeldt’s Empirical Analysis
138 F.3d 373 · 1998
Citation profile
25 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently August 2019 · most notably United States v. Fields (2007), United States v. Smith (1999)
25 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1951 (Hobbs Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 28 U.S.C. § 1861 (Jury Selection and Service Act of 1968)
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Faretta v. California · Taylor v. United States · Bourjaily v. United States · Arizona v. Youngblood
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'Where the prosecution delays disclosure of evidence, but the evidence is nonetheless disclosed during the trial, Brady is not violated.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The issue is whether the charging document as a whole shows that the defendant was charged only with [an ACCA violent felony].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“look to the charging document or the text of [the defendant’s] guilty plea” to determine if the prior offense was a”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.