Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 138 F.3d 39 - In re Coltex Loop Central Three Partners, L.P.

In re Coltex Loop Central Three Partners, L.P.’s Empirical Analysis

138 F.3d 39 · 1998

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
January 2019
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2019

6 federal appellate · 1 district ·

110199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Dewsnup v. Timm · Norwest Bank Worthington v. Ahlers · U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. Bonner Mall Partnership · Case v. Los Angeles Lumber Products Co. · Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Boyd

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In this case, BT/SAP was ready with a plan of its own, which proposed to pay non-insider unsecured creditors in full. It would have left Coltex’s Partners with nothing. They, like anyone else, could have attempted to purchase the Property at market price. Instead, under the Plan, the Partners avoid foreclosure by BT/SAP and obtain the Property at a set price untested by market forces, leaving the unsecured creditors with a ten percent recovery. Common sense suggests that the Partners believe that they are getting a bargain by virtue of their previous position, which enables them to avoid both competing reorganization plans and competing bids for the property.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “needs funds from the prior owner-managers because no other source of capital is available”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “as long as no class junior to the dissenting class receives anything at all”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.