Crist v. Leippe’s Empirical Analysis
138 F.3d 801 · 1998
Citation profile
14 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently December 2014 · most notably Alexandra White Joseph Deringer Richard Graham v. Russell Lee Lynn Tamiyasu-Lee Lavera Gillespie Paul Smith Robert Zurowski John Phillips Elizabeth Julian (2000), Association of American Medical Colleges v. United States (2000)
14 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 49 U.S.C. § 46110 · 5 U.S.C. § 552 (Freedom of Information Act) · 5 U.S.C. § 552A (§ 3 of the Privacy Act of 1974)
Relies on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Federal Trade Commission v. Standard Oil Co. · Greenwood v. Federal Aviation Administration · Clark v. Busey · Go Leasing, Inc. v. National Transportation Safety Board
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“‘Order’ carries a note of finality, and applies to any agency decision which imposes an obligation, denies a right, or fixes some legal relationship. In other words, if the order provides a ‘definitive’ statement of the agency’s position, has a ‘direct and immediate’ effect on the day-to-day business of the party asserting wrongdoing, and envisions ‘immediate compliance with its terms,’ the order has sufficient finality to warrant the appeal offered by section [46110].”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“carries a note of finality, and applies to any agency decision which imposes an obligation, denies a right, or fixes some legal relationship. In other words, if the order provides a”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Gilmore v. Gonzales“ ‘inescapably intertwined with a review of the procedures and merits surrounding the FAA’s order’ ”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.