Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 138 Fla. 104 - Pierson v. Bill

Pierson v. Bill’s Empirical Analysis

1939

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
6
states following
September 1994
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently September 1994

20 state decisions

901939194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Quinn v. Phipps · Sorrells v. McNally · Girard Trust Co. v. Tampashores Development Co. · Walker v. Landress · Wittmeir v. Leonard

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[s]uch proceedings in the probate court do not constitute constructive notice to subsequent purchasers for value.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.