Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 138 FSUPP 120 - Hood v. Lawrence

Hood v. Lawrence’s Empirical Analysis

1955

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
September 1979
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Kay v. General Cable Corp. · Boston & M. R. R. v. Bentubo · John S. Doane Co. v. Martin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The purpose of an award of damages is to compensate the veteran rather than to penalize the employer, and the court is vested with discretionary power to fix the award so that it will not exceed the amount which the veteran has actually lost by reason of the employer’s wrongful action. Boston & Maine Railroad v. Bentubo, 1 Cir., 160 F.2d 326 ; John S. Doane Co. v. Martin, 1 Cir., 164 F.2d 537 . “ * * * [Petitioner] received state unemployment compensation in the amount of $120, and to this extent wage loss is reduced in computing an award of damages.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.