138 F. Supp. 2d 232 - Harrington v. Herman’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 481 · 29 U.S.C. § 482
Relies on Trbovich v. United Mine Workers · Dunlop v. Bachowski · Local No. 82, Furniture & Piano Moving, Furniture Store Drivers, Helpers, Warehousemen & Packers v. Crowley · Doyle v. Brock · Donovan v. National Transient Division International Brotherhood of Boilermakers Iron Ship Builders Blacksmiths Forgers and Helpers
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“labor organization. The available evidence indicates that the locals that comprise the Regional Council have not been dissolved or absorbed by the Regional Council so as to be mere administrative arms of the Council, but rather appear to continue to function as separate labor organizations under the Act. From the evidence obtained from the Department's investigation, the locals subordinate to the Regional Council satisfy the definition of”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Harrington v. Chao“Officers of intermediate bodies, such as general committees, system boards, joint boards, or joint councils, shall be elected not less often than once every four years by secret ballot among the members in good standing or by labor organization officers representative of such members who have been elected by secret ballot.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Harrington v. Chao“There is no basis in the statute or in the legislative history for concluding that if intermediate bodies possess certain functions and powers, they may only elect their officers directly by secret ballot vote among the members of the intermediate body.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Harrington v. Chao
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.