State v. Kazanas.’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

24 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “the touchstone in analyzing whether 'interrogation' has taken place is whether the police officer 'should have known that his or her words and actions were reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response from the defendant.'”

   7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
   e.g. State v. Nakagawa · State v. Sebay

2. “in the sense that the defendant is deprived of his or her freedom of action in any significant way.”

   5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
   e.g. State v. Nakagawa · State v. Sebay

3. “A critical safeguard is the Miranda warning: an accused must be warned that he or she had a right to remain silent, that anything said could be used against him or her, that he or she had a right to the presence of an attorney, and that if he or she could not afford an attorney one would be appointed for him or her.”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
   e.g. State v. Stroeve · State v. Giugliano