Rodgers v. Marks’s Empirical Analysis
1964
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 1967
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Pokraka v. Lummus Co. · Rowe v. Johnson · Craig, Exrx. v. Citizens Trust Company · Lassiter v. Goldblatt Bros. · 85 Ind. App. 428 - Ireland v. Francisco Mining Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““That intention should be determined by reference to the instrument itself, Ireland v. Francisco Mining Co. (1926), 85 Ind. App. 428, 431 , 151 N. E. 700 , 154 N. E. 239 , the circumstances attending and leading up to its execution, and the situation of the parties as of that time. Lassiter v. Goldblatt Bros. (1942), 220 Ind. 215, 218 , 41 N. E. 2d 803 .” Rodgers v. Marks (1964), 138 Ind. App. 35 , 202 N. E. 2d 764, 765 , 4 Ind. Dec. 285 , 288, (Transfer denied).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Kuhn v. Kruger
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.