State v. Richardson’s Empirical Analysis
1933
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
March 1964
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Briggs · State v. Robinson · State v. Woodbury · State v. Sherman · State v. Meade
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The court gave to the jury the instruction approved in Commonwealth v. Tuey, 8 Cush. (Mass.) 1. To the instruction the court appended an admonition, clearly and forcibly restating the matter carefully expressed at the beginning. Guarded in this way, the instruction contravened no decision of this court, and there is no reason to believe it was prejudicial.” (p. 582.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Eikmeier v. Bennett““We do not regard the giving of this instruction as of sufficient gravity to warrant a reversal, since the record does not permit this court to entertain any misgivings as to the correctness of the result.” (p. 476.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Eikmeier v. Bennett
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.