Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 138 KAN 477 - Hawkins v. Gregory

Hawkins v. Gregory’s Empirical Analysis

1933

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
March 1980
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently March 1980

10 state decisions

40193319401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State ex rel. Boynton v. Public Service Commission · Bobbett v. State · Craft v. Com'rs Jackson Co. · State ex rel. Weber v. Younkin · State ex rel. McBride v. Board of Commissioners

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"[The] state is adequately provided with officers to attend to matters of this sort, and even neglect of or inattention to such duties by public officials does not warrant their assumption by private litigants except where the statutes so provide."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Early in the history of this state it was determined that ‘. . . for wrongs against the public, whether actually committed or only apprehended, the remedy, whether civil or criminal, is by a prosecution instituted by the state in its political character. . . .’ (Craft v. Jackson Co., 5 Kan. 518, 521 ; and see Clark v. George, 118 Kan. 667, 669 , 236 Pac. 543 .) This principle applies not only in injunction, but in mandamus (Bobbett v. State, ex rel. Dresher, 10 Kan. 9 ; Collingwood v. Schmidt, 125 Kan. 81 , 262 Pac. 556 ) and other forms of action, many examples of which are found in our reports.” (p. 348.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.