Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 138 KAN 661 - Frazier v. Ford

Frazier v. Ford’s Empirical Analysis

1933

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
July 2000
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently July 2000

9 state decisions

3019331940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McFall v. Ford · Thomas v. McFall · McFall v. Ford

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Under the redemption law of this state land sold to satisfy a judgment may be redeemed by the landowner and by certain creditors. Within the first twelve months after sale the landowner has exclusive privilege to redeem. If redemption be not made within that period, any creditor whose demand is a lien may redeem within fifteen months from date of sale, . . .” (p. 663.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.