Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 138 KAN 705 - Johnson v. Eddy

Johnson v. Eddy’s Empirical Analysis

1933

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 1944
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Phillips v. Yates Center National Bank · Kansas ex rel. Boynton v. Hayes · Wulf v. Fitzpatrick

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Under the findings of fact, it is clear that in receiving public deposits and in giving security therefor the trust company was acting in the same manner as though it were a bank, and our conclusion is that at least under these circumstances it was so far a bank that its giving of security by delivery of the notes . . . was a lawful act, binding on the trust company and on its receiver.” (p. 713.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““In some respects the powers of a state bank and a trust company are common, and in other respects similar, as a reference to the banking laws (R. S. 9-101 et seq.) and trust company laws (R. S. 17-2001 et seq.), both as amended, will show.” (p. 712.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.