138 Md. App. 372 - Modecki v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
December 2017
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Wong Sun v. United States · Whren v. United States · United States v. Crews · Innkeepers of New Castle, Inc. v. Maley · Miller v. Albright
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“and the illegality of his detention cannot deprive the Government of the opportunity to prove his guilt through the introduction of evidence wholly untainted by the police misconduct. 445 U.S. at 474 , 100 S.Ct. 1244 (emphasis supplied). See also New York v. Harris , 495 U.S. 14 , 18, 110 S.Ct. 1640 , 109 L.Ed.2d 13 (1990) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“In accordance with Justice Brennan's opinion in Crews , we hereby hold that neither appellant's person nor his identity was a "fruit" of his detention that would be subject to suppression even if that detention was unlawful. ... The evidence used to convict him was wholly untainted by that seizure and detention.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the police would otherwise not have been aware of.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.