Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 138 Md. App. 438 - Edmonds v. State

138 Md. App. 438 - Edmonds v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
January 2005
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on GLK, Inc. v. United States · Dorsey v. State · Boston Firefighters Union, Local 718 v. Boston Chapter, NAACP · Laskey Bros. of West Virginia, Inc. v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc. · In re Disbarment of Alexander

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The general purpose of the sequestration of witnesses “has been to prevent . .. witnesses from being taught or prompted by each other’s testimony”. Additionally, the object of Maryland Rule 5-615 “is to prevent one prospective witness from being taught by hearing another’s testimony; its application avoids an artificial harmony of all the testimony; it may also avoid the outright manufacture of testimony.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.